It’s amazing… they put our film above Indiana Jones for it’s UK opening… Look to the right side of the page under cinema…http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/index.php?page=Default
Then click on it… Or, here’s the direct link for the story which couldn’t be more nurturing… http://www.dvdtimes.co.uk/content.php?contentid=67882
But if you prefer not to click around, here it is…
Showing that there is more to the American independent movie scene than geek love and inarticulate mumblecore, the debut directing feature written, produced and directed by actor Christopher Jaymes, demonstrates that is it possible to make a low-budget feature on Digital Video and also be smart, stylish and very, very funny. Not only however is the script of In Memory Of My Father razor sharp, brimming with intelligence, wit and profanity, but Jaymes shows that indie filmmaking doesn’t necessarily have to rely on non-professional actors either – and when the script is this good, you really want actors who are strong enough to deliver it with the appropriate sense of irony and comic timing.
The tone adopted here is not unlike Thomas Winterberg’s controversial Dogme standard-bearer Festen (The Celebration), striking the viewer from the outset with its transgressive and blackly comic sense of absurdity as the film crew fall over each other trying to record the last breath of an old, dying man. Where Festen however took a critical stance at the deep corruption of the Danish upper classes, In Memory Of My Father turns its gaze on the narcissism of the Hollywood lifestyle, where sex and drugs are freely available, and the family unit is equally a cause for dysfunctional behaviour. With all these sexual and emotional tensions building, the occasion of their father’s death and the gathering of family and friends provides ample opportunity for the inevitable meltdown that is to occur. But their father still has one more shock for them from beyond the grave.
I cut out the part where they talk about what the film is about, you can always go there for the full review… Here’s where it continues…
But it’s not all sleaze and satire. There’s depth to the characterisation, each of the brother’s full-rounded characters with distinct and consistent personalities (the use of the actors own names suggests that they are probably drawing from their own personalities to some extent), but even secondary characters are well-defined, never appearing to be mere romantic-interest or conflict-generation devices to move the plot forward. The target of the over-privileged and over-indulged Hollywood Hills crowd with all their hang-ups and insecurities might appear an obvious target for satire, but like the work of Arnaud Desplechin (Kings & Queen), Christopher Jaymes gets to the nature of dysfunction within artistic families, intelligently, credibly and with a great deal of wit and humour. Clearly a major new talent in the making, Jaymes’ debut feature is simply phenomenal.
Come & hang out as a few us will be there for the opening night Q&A and drinks afterwards.
Review in Total Film – a UK based publication In Memory Of My Father **** Certificate: 15
Running time: 96 minutes
There’s more than a whiff of Festen and Altman in first-time director Christopher James’s frantic, enjoyably overstuffed funeral drama, as the three troubled sons of a has-been Hollywood producer throw a rowdy wake for their problem patriach, which he has bribed the youngest son Chris to film. Despite the cooling corpse and the cameras, family tensions explode into black comedy as Chris finds himself torn between two lovers, cuckolded middle son Jeremy explores Ecstasy and marital honesty, and eldest son Matt gives his father’s ex-lover carnal comfort on the bedroom carpet. The film skewers revels in narcotic-fuelled Hollywood narcissism, with a no-holds-barred performance from Jeremy ‘Six Feet Under’ Sisto, and Judy Greer, hilariously dippy, greedy and horny as Dad’s last squeeze.
We’ve started to receive reviews from UK based publications surrounding the release of In Memory of My Father!! IMOMF opens at the Institute of Contemporary Art, London for a two-week run on June 6, 2008. Here is a new review from Film Review… a nice one!! And below that one from MAXIM… Please tell all of your UK friends to come check it out!!
In Memory of My Father
4 stars
The title might suggest a straightforward drama of love and loss, but it’s clear from the opening scene – which sees wannabe film-maker Chris (Jaymes) pointing a camera straight in the face of his Hollywood producer father as he breathes his last – that it’s all a bit more complicated than that. For Dad’s (Austin) dying wish was for his youngest son to document not just his death, but also his wake and the impact his passing has on his nearest and dearest. And it’s not long before said wake descends into chaos – with Chris attempting to juggle his filming duties with his overwhelming feelings for his ex-lover Nicholle (Tom) and the demands of his new teenage girlfriend Christine (Lakin); his brother Matt (Keeslar) enjoying a passionate – if brief – affair with his father’s young widow Judy (Greer) and their messed up sibling Jeremy (Sisto) embarking on a drug-fuelled, faintly homoerotic journey of self discovery with new best friend Eric (Cole).
As an increasing number of characters join the raucous fray, relationships between them become confusing. It’s made even more muddled with the discovery that the boys’ uncle stole away their mother years previously, making cousins half-siblings and muddying the mix even further. But this just adds to the enjoyable mania of the piece and, as the action takes place over the course of one traumatic day, you can’t help but be swept along with it.
But for all the mayhem – of which there is a great deal – this is more than just a snapshot of dysfunctional modern family life. Writer/director/star Jaymes has brought a great deal of acerbic humour and edgy characterisation to his script, and the pace never lets up for a second. Yet underneath it all there’s some genuine heart; Jeremy’s burgeoning friendship with Eric is surprisingly touching, while Chris’s pain at both his father’s death and his mother’s betrayal occasionally crack his sarcastic mask. In fact, all of the boys carry their fathers legacy through their messed up relationships with women – having witnessed their mother leave for their uncle, and their dad subsequently hook up with a string of unsuitable women, it’s not surprising that they are all struggling to make valid commitments.
As the movie boomerangs between laugh out loud humour, high drama and moments of genuine pathos, Jaymes keeps his hand expertly on the rudder – even more impressive considering he’s also taken a starring role – so keeping the tone balanced throughout. His cast are excellent and clearly loving every minute, Jaymes and Sisto in particular embrace their characters with gusto and it’s impossible not to be caught up in the moment with them. All in all, it’s a small film with a big reach, a great antidote to the summer’s blockbuster onslaught that effectively showcases some of Hollywood’s most promising young talent.
Film Review – U.K.
Nikki Baughan
As strange as it may seem… IMOMF is getting reviewed in England’s Maxim Magazine… They only place three films in the printed version per month and ours is one of them!! Here’s a blurb from the review.
In Memory Of My Father – 4 stars
If you like your comedy dark and your film families truly demented, Christopher Jaymes’ dysfunctional gem is for you. A Hollywood producer has died and his youngest son Chris has been asked to film the ensuing wake. The result? Familial carnage so funny and so ridiculous you’ll be weeping tears of joyous blood. Thanks so much Maxim!! Look forward to seeing you in London!!
Talked to a friend today who was having a tough time with a cyclical issue that consistantly returns surrounding her career. A huge amount of work spent towards an overwhelming accomplishment that she succeeds to pull off while those surrounding her tend to get the credit and the reward. When something is so cyclical and recurring there is no denying that you are creating it, that you in some way have decided that this is how it will be and until you understand the crappy agreement you have allowed yourself to settle for, the contract you have made with yourself to say… ‘Yes, this is how it’ll be for me… I’ll take it.’ You will continue to succeed at fulfilling this unconsciously accepted goal. You may not want it or like it in any manner and wish so desperately for it to be different, but that is irrelevant as you have scarred yourself with this subconscious tattoo that will continue to live on inside of you.The conversation started with that customary greeting of ‘how’s it going’ and was responded to with that response that we tend to hear so often.
“Same shit.”
A few reaffirming sentences validate the commraderie of living in that state.
“Same shit, just a different pile” as another friend said to me the previous day. Somehow that quickly stimulated something along the lines of… “Like a hamster on a treadmill.” And then it hit me.
The feet of a hamster seem more like hands, don’t they? Kind of? The hamsters I remember holding years ago seemed to have long, lanky toes that were more like stiff little fingers. I started imaging those little hand-feet (we’ll call them) having to grab onto whatever it was that they were walking on, with every step. Then I began to realize that those spinning wheels that they run on are not your average treadmill, as they are generally constructed with lots of cross bars instead of a flat surface. A human running on a treadmill just clomps along, thoughtlessly pounding upon the spinning surface, but for a hamster it’s not so simple. They don’t have big flat soles pushing the bars of their treadmill, but instead their little hand-feet have to grab onto each passing bar with meticuluous precision again and again and again without allowing their legs to fall between the cracks. And those bars are generally not moving slowly, usually you can feel the winds a few feet from the cage. Not only that, but the bars are passing within an inch of their eyes, distorting and blurring anything in front of them. It’s an extremely demanding task on the hamster’s entire being… imagine it… It’s like if you were forced to cross a mile long river hanging from monkey bars that were actually train tracks and the train was just behind you forcing you to travel at the speed of an amphetamine.
Grab… grab… grab… grab, grab, grab, grabgrabgrabGRABGRABGRABGRABGRABGRABGRABGRABGRAB… and you can’t see shit, but you don’t feel safe closing your eyes. Focus, focus, focus… the world is spinning in front of you, precision grabs, don’t slip, don’t let up or you’re fucked… and… whew… nice one. Let’s go stick our nose on this metal ball over here so some water can spill on my face and I’ll try to swallow a bit of it before it gets dried up by the chemically-manufactured bits of crap they’ve covered my floor with making it so I can’t see where to avoid walking on all the shit I’ve made over the past four days since they last cleaned my cage.
I think these hamsters may not be getting the credit they really deserve. Honestly, at the end of the day, how often do you hear people commending hamsters for what they go through? But then again, at the end of the day… they are just hamsters.
Here are a few stories from some of the research I’ve done surrounding the documentary I’ve been working on called ‘Shrink Me’ about the use of pharmaceutical drugs for mental stability.
Okay, so… since Lithium is pretty much the oldest drug used as a mood stabilizer I guess we should give it the respect it deserves and get to know it just a touch before ingesting it, right? Now, I should make it clear that these history lessons should be thought of more as lesions than lessons, as I don’t have a research team working with me at the moment and I only have so much patience cross checking information… but here we go…
At the end of the 1700s, the miners and the scientists came out of the ground with a mineral called petalite which contained Litium, however it wasn’t isolated to stand independently on it’s own until the early 1800s when electrolysis was imposed upon what is now known as lithium oxide. And just to clarify, these Swedish scientists were not attempting to remove the hair from these minerals as these fall into the category of non-hair-growing minerals, and this form of electrolysis is when you stimulate decomposition by introducing the liquid or solid to an electric current. Hello electricity… Hello what is now called Lithium Oxide, since we have not yet isolated Lithium… Let’s meet up and make Lithium cause maybe it’ll help people with their manic moods… and so here we are.
Before we get too far with this, I feel like I should mention that there is also a company called Lithia Springs Mineral Water who claim that in the mid-1800s the spring that they pull water from was used by a few doctors because of it’s high lithium content to treat alcoholism, opium addiction and other key issues that I’m hoping to face at some point in the near future, so I suppose I should hurry and get my order in when they start accepting them this summer.
Now, the real clincher of exciting knowledge… Lithium comes from the Greek word ‘lithos’ which means ’stone’ seeing as it was the only element in Group 1 of the periodic table that was from a mineral, where the other two common elements, sodium and potassium were discovered from plant sources. The only thing more exciting than that is that Lithos is also a typeface made to resemble the geometric letterforms of Ancient Greek engravings and an article I found written in that typesetting went on to discuss the views that Ancients Greeks (or at least some of them) had towards mental illness, and a good majority of them viewed it as possession from evil spirits and used exorcism, which in some instances used physical beatings in attempts to drive the spirits away. That said… would it be safe to say that one way to view Lithium nowadays might be that your psychiatrist has tossed you a stone to throw at your demons?
So then, from what I gather… our scientists got to work and throughout the late 1800s used lithium to treat a number of issues because they found it was effective at breaking down uric acid. The most common disease being doused with miniscule bits of lithium at the time was gout, a disease where your body cannot properly metabolize uric acid, causing arthritis in the smaller bones in your feet (but not limited to those bones). Uric acid was the Serotonin of it’s day in a way (popularity, I mean) and was blamed for many disorders, one of those being manic depression. Apparently, a few doctors began using lithium to treat ‘mania’ throughout the 1870s, (mania being the manic state of bipolar disorder) as it seemed to sedate the patient from experiencing these hyper-enthusiastic states of sweaty-forehead coated euphoria. So, on the one hand, lithium was being used to treat arthritis in the body and on the other, trying to induce arthritis in the mind. Seeing that the pharmaceutical industry couldn’t patent that gentle little silvery-white metal known as atomic element #3, a significant budget was never spent on research and lithium began suffering from abandonment issues of it’s own until the mid 1900s.
In 1949, John Cade so couragously began using extracts from pee that he took from schizophrenic patients and injecting it into rodents hoping to isolate the culprit agent that was causing that socially unacceptable behavior. In experiments such as these, do you think that in order to see if one specific rodent seems to detach from reality to embrace a delusional, fantasy driven world, do you first need to spend time getting to know the rodent in order to properly observe the transformation? If not, how do you truly gauge the schizophrenia they are acquiring from the pee injections? And if they do seem upset, could it be justified that most anyone might get upset if someone was peeing IN them. Unfortunately, Cade didn’t succeed at transforming the rodents’ ideological perception of themselves, but he did confirm that an isolated lithium ion tranquilized the rodents, and that was that. He began treating hospitalized patients and published the first paper to be written on the use of lithium in the treatment of acute mania. In 1970, the use of lithium was actually approved by the Food and Drug Administration, regardless of the fact that no one really knew why it worked. That didn’t come until 1998.
Researchers based out of the University of Wisconsin came to the conclusion that lithium promoted glutamate stabilization. What is glutamate? A key molecule in cellular metabolism. Without getting too far gone with tons and tons of information, for now just think of it as this… glutamate needs to travel through the brain from neuron to receptor to keep things functioning nicely. Too much glutamate between neurons gives you mania, too little gives you depression. Lithium helps regulate and stabilize this, like a car wash for the roadways, only the suds seem to bind the car to the middle lane. Or at least, that’s what everything seems to say. Personally, I can’t confirm any of this as I haven’t started taking it yet, but it’s coming and the more I learn about it, the more my nerves seem to sputter and splinker and splunket. Lots of unfeigned sp-ing. Sort of like that nervousness you feel when the hooker jumps off from her straddle and rips the condom off of you, screaming out with earnest passion… ‘I just want to feel you’. There’s an underlying fear-engulfed excitement, but the ambiguity of what’s to come slightly inhibits the enjoyment of your otherwise harmonious union. Or at least, something close to that.
There are a lot of warnings and side effects and ’causes of death’ (more in the early life of the drug) that have occurred, but there are also a lot of success stories, so who would want to miss out on those odds? You are supposed to have blood tests and thyroid tests and a few other tests before using it, and then again every few months being on it. Did my psychiatrist demand that I do that prior to taking it? Of course not. Did yours? How often do they? Sadly, the inconvenience of taking the blood test would put off most people from taking the drug and is it really worth the risk of losing another taker who will most definitely be successfully sedated from that awful state of mania? I have to stop now, I’m prematurely judging and my banter is just that until I have proven different by putting some time in on the drug. Start soon. Can’t Wait?